An audit exercise to identify gaps in the implementation of construction site management practices through observational data collection

Abstract

This research evaluates the present level of building site management procedures in Malta by using a benchmarking exercise that compares optimal practice to the UK construction sector. The motivation stems from persistent issues of failure in Malta's construction sector, including building collapses and worker fatalities. Despite regulatory revisions and proposals for a comprehensive construction framework, significant gaps in site management remain unaddressed, necessitating a thorough evaluation. The research aims to identify discrepancies between Maltese and UK best practice, to analyse how these differences impact compliance with local legislation and industry standards, and propose actionable recommendations to improve site safety, efficiency, and regulatory adherence. Utilising a deductive research approach, the study draws on data from construction projects, an audit checklist compiled on themes identified in a literature review, and transcribed data from key stakeholders in medium-scale construction projects locally. This multi-method approach combines observational data collection and interview data from 8 case studies, focusing on parameters related to: site organisation, physical and mental well-being, material and environmental management, and communication practices. Thematic analysis reveals critical gaps in Maltese practices in all the five themes examined. Findings indicate a pressing need for a robust regulatory framework, improved site management standards, and enhanced training programs. Recommendations emphasise adopting UK best practices tailored to the Maltese context, strengthening regulatory oversight, and fostering a safety-centric culture in the construction industry. This dissertation contributes to the ongoing discourse on construction site management in Malta, offering insights for policymakers and industry practitioners aimed at mitigating risks and enhancing project outcomes.