Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/144852| Title: | Protecting land and livelihoods : Virginia landowners’ perspectives of conservation easements |
| Authors: | Scott, Kailie (2025) |
| Keywords: | Conservation easements -- Virginia Land use -- Virginia Land use -- Environmental aspects -- Virginia Landowners -- Virginia Natural areas -- Virginia Land trusts -- Virginia |
| Issue Date: | 2025 |
| Citation: | Scott, K. (2025). Protecting land and livelihoods : Virginia landowners’ perspectives of conservation easements (Master’s dissertation). |
| Abstract: | Land conservation on private lands is essential to maintaining biodiversity and ecological resilience, particularly in rapidly developing states such as Virginia. Conservation easements, voluntary legal agreements that restrict land use to protect ecological values, serve as a primary tool for private land conservation but remain unevenly distributed across the state. This study explored Virginia landowners’ motivations, barriers, and perceptions regarding conservation easement participation to better inform equitable and inclusive conservation policy. Using a qualitative multiple case study approach, six landowners were interviewed, including those who had established easements, acquired properties already under easement, and those who had opted not to participate in conservation easement programs. Results revealed that while conservation ethics and stewardship strongly motivate participation, financial incentives played a crucial enabling role. However, current tax-based structures may disproportionately benefit wealthier landowners, limiting accessibility for working farmers and rural landowners. Participants also highlighted the complexity, cost, and rigidity of easement processes as additional barriers. Successor landowners expressed mixed experiences, citing challenges in flexibility and communication with easement holders. Findings underscored the need for policy reform that improves financial accessibility, enhances transparency, and fosters trust between landowners and conservation organizations. The study concluded that adaptive, relationship based approaches, and balancing perpetuity with flexibility are essential to expanding participation in conservation easements and strengthening Virginia’s long-term ecological connectivity. |
| Description: | MSc. (EMS)(Melit.) |
| URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/144852 |
| Appears in Collections: | Dissertations - InsES - 2025 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2518IESIES504105084376_1.PDF Restricted Access | 1.43 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
