Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145196
Title: Lecture on Constitutional supremacy : different experiences in the United States, India and Malta
Authors: Borg, Tonio
Keywords: Constitutions -- United States
Constitutions -- India
Constitutions -- Malta
Constitutional courts -- United States
Constitutional courts -- India
Constitutional courts -- Malta
Issue Date: 2026-03
Citation: Borg, T. (2026, March 20). Lecture on Constitutional supremacy : different experiences in the United States, India and Malta. London : City London University.
Abstract: The idea of a written Constitution being supreme is a relatively recent one. It was only with the birth of the Constitution of the United States of America in 1789 that the idea was born that a written constitution should be regarded as the apex or the supreme law; and then such supremacy was not enshrined in the Constitution itself but was only the result of the landmark judgment in 1803 of Marbury v . Madison. Indeed, the United States Constitution does not have a supremacy clause except one which proclaims the supremacy of the Federal Constitution vis a vis the State constitutions ; but it is silent on whether the Constitution prevails over the measures and actions of the Federal institutions such as Congress or the President of the United States. [extract]
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145196
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacLawPub



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.