Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145196| Title: | Lecture on Constitutional supremacy : different experiences in the United States, India and Malta |
| Authors: | Borg, Tonio |
| Keywords: | Constitutions -- United States Constitutions -- India Constitutions -- Malta Constitutional courts -- United States Constitutional courts -- India Constitutional courts -- Malta |
| Issue Date: | 2026-03 |
| Citation: | Borg, T. (2026, March 20). Lecture on Constitutional supremacy : different experiences in the United States, India and Malta. London : City London University. |
| Abstract: | The idea of a written Constitution being supreme is a relatively recent one. It was only with the birth of the Constitution of the United States of America in 1789 that the idea was born that a written constitution should be regarded as the apex or the supreme law; and then such supremacy was not enshrined in the Constitution itself but was only the result of the landmark judgment in 1803 of Marbury v . Madison. Indeed, the United States Constitution does not have a supremacy clause except one which proclaims the supremacy of the Federal Constitution vis a vis the State constitutions ; but it is silent on whether the Constitution prevails over the measures and actions of the Federal institutions such as Congress or the President of the United States. [extract] |
| URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145196 |
| Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacLawPub |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lecture_on_Constitutional_supremacy_different_experiences_in_the_United_States_India_and_Malta_2026.pdf | 182.59 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
