Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147487
Title: Who is to blame when AI fails? Attribution processes in anthropomorphic chatbot interactions
Authors: Mercieca, Joana
Castillo, Daniela
Keywords: Artificial intelligence -- Moral and ethical aspects
Anthropomorphism
Chatbots -- Psychological aspects
Attribution (Social psychology)
Human-computer interaction
Issue Date: 2026-06
Publisher: American Marketing Association (AMA)
Citation: Mercieca, J., & Castillo, D. (2026, June). Who is to blame when AI fails? attribution processes in anthropomorphic chatbot interactions. 14th SERVSIG Conference proceedings: shaping the future through service: transforming individuals, markets & society, Braga, Portugal. 213.
Abstract: The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI)–powered chatbots into digital customer service has fundamentally changed customer–brand interactions. While chatbots enable efficiency, accessibility and 24/7 service provision, their growing human-like design features also raise customer expectations regarding competence, responsibility and accountability. When chatbot failures occur, these heightened expectations may amplify customers’ emotional and behavioural reactions. Despite expanding research on chatbot performance and effectiveness, limited attention has been given to how customers cognitively evaluate and behaviourally respond to chatbot failures, particularly in relation to perceived anthropomorphism. Addressing this gap is essential for advancing service theory in AI-mediated contexts. [excerpt]
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147487
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacEMAMar

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Who is to blame when AI fails attribution processes in anthropomorphic chatbot interactions.pdf
  Restricted Access
50.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.