Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30078
Title: How good is your marine protected area at curbing threats?
Authors: Zupan, Mirta
Bulleri, Fabio
Evans, Julian
Fraschetti, Simonetta
Guidetti, Paolo
Garcia-Rubies, Antoni
Sostres, Marta
Asnaghi, Valentina
Caro, Anthony
Deudero, Salud
Goni, Raquel
Guarnieri, Giuseppe
Guilhaumon, Francois
Kersting, Diego Kurt
Kokkali, Athina
Kruschel, Claudia
Macic, Vesna
Mangialajo, Luisa
Mallol, Sandra
Macpherson, Enrique
Panucci, Antonella
Radolovic, Mirko
Ramdani, Mohammed
Schembri, Patrick J.
Terlizzi, Antonio
Villa, Elisa
Claudet, Joachim
Keywords: Marine parks and reserves -- Management
Marine parks and reserves -- Mediterranean Region
Coastal ecosystem health -- Mediterranean Region
Biodiversity conservation -- Mediterranean Region
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd.
Citation: Zupan, M., Bulleri, F., Evans, J., Fraschetti, S., Guidetti, P., Garcia-Rubies, A.,... Claudet, J. (2018). How good is your marine protected area at curbing threats?. Biological Conservation, 221, 237-245.
Abstract: Marine protected areas (MPAs) are key tools to mitigate human impacts in coastal environments, promoting sustainable activities to conserve biodiversity. The designation of MPAs alone may not result in the lessening of some human threats, which is highly dependent on management goals and the related specific regulations that are adopted. Here, we develop and operationalize a local threat assessment framework. We develop indices to quantify the effectiveness of MPAs (or individual zones within MPAs in the case of multiple-use MPAs) in reducing anthropogenic extractive and non-extractive threats operating at local scale, focusing specifically on threats that can be managed through MPAs. We apply this framework in 15 Mediterranean MPAs to assess their threat reduction capacity. We show that fully protected areas effectively eliminate extractive activities, whereas the intensity of artisanal and recreational fishing within partially protected areas, paradoxically, is higher than that found outside MPAs, questioning their ability at reaching conservation targets. In addition, both fully and partially protected areas attract non-extractive activities that are potential threats. Overall, only three of the 15 MPAs had lower intensities for the entire set of eight threats considered, in respect to adjacent control unprotected areas. Understanding the intensity and occurrence of human threats operating at the local scale inside and around MPAs is important for assessing MPAs effectiveness in achieving the goals they have been designed for, informing management strategies, and prioritizing specific actions.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/30078
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacSciBio

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
32. Zupan et al (2018) Assessing MPA effectiveness.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.