Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30312
Title: Consistency between examiners in the final anatomy exam 2008-2009
Authors: Stabile, Isabel
Micallef Attard, R.
Keywords: Anatomy -- Study and teaching -- Malta
Anatomy -- Examinations, questions, etc
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: University of Malta. Faculty of Medicine and Surgery
Citation: Stabile, I., & Micallef Attard, R. (2009). Consistency between examiners in the final anatomy exam 2008-2009. Malta Medical Journal, 21(Supplement), 63-64.
Abstract: The final anatomy examination at the end of year 2 is composed of 2 written exam papers consisting of eight sections, each of which contains EMQs,True/False questions and Short Response Questions. Each section is set and marked by two examiners. An external examiner reviews all papers before the exam. Each section is marked blind twice i.e., the second examiner is not aware of the marks of the first examiner based on a model answer. In most but not in all cases, the two examiners have both taught the material being examined. After all marks are compiled, significant discrepancies between examiners are reconciled. In all other cases the marks of the two examiners are averaged and a final mark is issued.The purpose of this study was to explore the consistency between the two internal examiners in their marks in the Short Response Questions.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/30312
ISSN: 18133339
Appears in Collections:MMJ, Volume 21, Supplement
MMJ, Volume 21, Supplement

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Consistency_between_examiners_in_the_final_anatomy_exam_2008-2009.pdf166.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.