Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Law, small state theory and the case of Liechtenstein|
Schiess Rütimann, Patricia M.
|Keywords:||Liechtenstein -- Politics and government|
States, Small -- Politics and government -- Case studies
Jurisdiction -- Liechtenstein
Liechtenstein. Laws, etc.
|Publisher:||University of Malta. Islands and Small States Institute|
|Citation:||Wolf, S., Bussjäger, P., & Schiess Rütimann, P.M. (2018). Law, small state theory and the case of Liechtenstein. Small States & Territories, 1(2), 183-196.|
|Abstract:||This interdisciplinary paper tries to identify specific small state characteristics with respect to the emergence, function and application of legal norms. Three respective assumptions are derived from theoretical considerations. An exploratory single-case study shows that all assumptions apply to Liechtenstein. The principality can be described as a hybrid legal system that is significantly shaped by foreign legal norms. Liechtenstein’s dualistic constitution particularly combines a powerful monarch with extensive direct democratic elements. The microstate’s legal system depends on supports from sources beyond its territory and citizenry, such as law schools, legal experts and academic sources. Several brief comparisons and examples regarding Andorra, Monaco and San Marino supplement the sociolegal study. Finally, the authors suggest to apply the assumptions to a wide range of jurisdictions in order to learn more about their explanatory power.|
|Appears in Collections:||SST Vol. 1, No. 2, November 2018|
SST Vol. 1, No. 2, November 2018
Files in This Item:
|SST-1-2-Wolf-et-al-FINAL.pdf||623.95 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.