Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Data in question : a survey of European biobank professionals on ethical, legal and societal challenges of biobank research
Authors: Goisauf, Melanie
Martin, Gillian M.
Bentzen, Heidi Beate
Budin-Ljøsne, Isabelle
Ursin, Lars
Durnova, Anna
Leitsalu, Liis
Smith, Katharine
Casati, Sara
Lavitrano, Marialuisa
Mascalzoni, Deborah
Boeckhout, Martin
Th. Mayrhofer, Michaela
Keywords: Data protection
Biobanks -- Law and legislation
Biobanks -- Management -- Government policy -- European Union countries
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Citation: Goisauf, M., Martin, G. M., Bentzen, H. B., Budin-Ljøsne, I., Ursin, L., Durnova, A.,… Th. Mayrhofer, M. (2019). Data in question : a survey of European biobank professionals on ethical, legal and societal challenges of biobank research. PLoS ONE, 14(9): e0221496.
Abstract: Biobanks have evolved, and their governance procedures have undergone important transformations. Our paper examines this issue by focusing on the perspective of the professionals working in management or scientific roles in research-based biobanks, who have an important impact on shaping these transformations. In particular, it highlights that recent advances in molecular medicine and genomic research have raised a range of ethical, legal and societal implications (ELSI) related to biobank-based research, impacting directly on regulations and local practices of informed consent (IC), private-public partnerships (PPPs), and engagement of participants. In our study, we investigate the ways that these concerns influence biobanking practices and assess the level of satisfaction of the cross-national biobanking research communities with the ELSI related procedures that are currently in place. We conducted an online survey among biobankers and researchers to investigate secondary use of data, informing and/or re-contacting participants, sharing of data with third parties from industry, participant engagement, and collaboration with industrial partners. Findings highlight the need for a more inclusive and transparent biobanking practice where biobanks are seen in a more active role in providing information and communicating with participants; the need to improve the current IC procedures and the role of biobanks in sharing of samples and data with industry partners and different countries, and the need for practical, tangible and hands-on ethical and legal guidance.
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacArtSoc

Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.