Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/22378
Title: | Assessing the incremental algorithm : a response to Krahmer et al |
Authors: | van Deemter, Kees Gatt, Albert van der Sluis, Ielka Power, Richard |
Keywords: | Reference (Linguistics) Natural language processing (Computer science) Corpora (Linguistics) Linguistic analysis (Linguistics) |
Issue Date: | 2012 |
Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. |
Citation: | Deemter, K. V., Gatt, A., Sluis, I. V. D., & Power, R. (2012). Assessing the incremental algorithm: a response to Krahmer et al. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 842-845. |
Abstract: | This response discusses the experiment reported in Krahmer et al.’s Letter to the Editor of Cognitive Science. We observe that their results do not tell us whether the Incremental Algorithm is better or worse than its competitors, and we speculate about implications for reference in complex domains, and for learning from ‘‘normal’’ (i.e., non-semantically-balanced) corpora. |
URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/22378 |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - InsLin |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Deemter_et_al-2012-Cognitive_Science.pdf Restricted Access | 54.77 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.