Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/103748
Title: Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants
Authors: Xing Gao, B.
Iglesias-Velázquez, O.
Tresguerres, F. G. F.
Cortes, Arthur R. G.
Tresguerres, I. F.
Ortega Aranegui, R.
López-Pintor, R. M.
López-Quiles, J.
Torres, J.
Keywords: Zygoma -- Fractures
Planning -- Case studies
Implants, Artificial
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: SpringerOpen
Citation: Xing Gao, B., Iglesias-Velázquez, O., Gf Tresguerres, F., Rodríguez González Cortes, A., F Tresguerres, I., Ortega Aranegui, R., ... & Torres, J. (2021). Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 7(1), 1-8.
Abstract: Background: Zygomatic implants have been described as a therapeutic alternative for patients with severe maxillary atrophy in order to avoid bone augmentation procedures. Taking that into account, in these treatments, the key factor is the position of the implant, the virtual surgical planning (VSP) is widespread among most clinicians before surgery on the patient. However, there are no studies which evaluate the clinical relevance of these VSP. The aim of this study is to determine whether digital planning on zygomatic implants has any influence on the implant dimensions and position, even when performing conventional surgery afterwards. Results: Fourteen zygomatic implants were placed in four patients. Pre-operative and post-operative helicoidal computed tomography were performed to each patient to allow the comparison between the digital planning and the final position of implants. Tridimensional deviation (TD), mesio-distal deviation (MDD), bucco-palatine deviation (BPD), and apico-coronal deviation (ACD) were evaluated as well as angular deviation (AD). Significative differences in apical TD were observed with a mean of 6.114 ± 4.28 mm (p < 0.05). Regarding implant position, only implants placed in the area of the first right molar reported significant differences (p < 0.05) for ACD. Also, implant length larger than 45 mm showed BPD significative differences (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Zygomatic implant surgery is a complex surgical procedure, and although VSP is a useful tool which helps the clinician determine the number and the length of zygomatic implants as well as its proper position, surgical experience is still mandatory.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/103748
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacDenDS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Accuracy_of_digital_planning_in_zygomatic_implants.pdf2.89 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.