Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/107746
Title: Chlorhexidine-based versus non-chlorhexidine dressings to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections : an evidence-based review
Authors: Azzopardi, Anthea
Trapani, Josef
Keywords: Catheterization -- Complications
Central venous catheters
Chlorhexidine
Disinfection and disinfectants -- Evaluation
Intensive care nursing
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
Citation: Azzopardi, A., & Trapani, J. (2022). Chlorhexidine‐based versus non‐chlorhexidine dressings to prevent catheter‐related bloodstream infections: An evidence‐based review. Nursing in Critical Care. 1-5.
Abstract: In patients with central venous catheters (CVCs) in situ, the development of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) is often linked with increased morbidity and mortality. Sterile gauze or transparent polyurethane dressings are conventionally used as extraluminal barriers; however, antimicrobial chlorhexidine CVC dressings could potentially reduce infection risk. This short evidence-based review examined the literature comparing the effectiveness of chlorhexidine-based CVC dressings against non-chlorhexidine dressings in reducing CRBSI occurrence. Four systematic reviews with meta-analysis were reviewed, all of which reported a statistically significant reduction in CRBSI occurrence on using chlorhexidine-based dressings. Further research is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of chlorhexidine-based CVC dressings and their effectiveness in reducing CRBSIs in different catheter types and entry sites because infection risk is not uniform.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/107746
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacHScNur



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.