Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/107746| Title: | Chlorhexidine-based versus non-chlorhexidine dressings to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections : an evidence-based review |
| Authors: | Azzopardi, Anthea Trapani, Josef |
| Keywords: | Catheterization -- Complications Central venous catheters Chlorhexidine Disinfection and disinfectants -- Evaluation Intensive care nursing |
| Issue Date: | 2022 |
| Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. |
| Citation: | Azzopardi, A., & Trapani, J. (2022). Chlorhexidine‐based versus non‐chlorhexidine dressings to prevent catheter‐related bloodstream infections: An evidence‐based review. Nursing in Critical Care. 1-5. |
| Abstract: | In patients with central venous catheters (CVCs) in situ, the development of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) is often linked with increased morbidity and mortality. Sterile gauze or transparent polyurethane dressings are conventionally used as extraluminal barriers; however, antimicrobial chlorhexidine CVC dressings could potentially reduce infection risk. This short evidence-based review examined the literature comparing the effectiveness of chlorhexidine-based CVC dressings against non-chlorhexidine dressings in reducing CRBSI occurrence. Four systematic reviews with meta-analysis were reviewed, all of which reported a statistically significant reduction in CRBSI occurrence on using chlorhexidine-based dressings. Further research is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of chlorhexidine-based CVC dressings and their effectiveness in reducing CRBSIs in different catheter types and entry sites because infection risk is not uniform. |
| URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/107746 |
| Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacHScNur |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorhexidine based versus non chlorhexidine dressings to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections an evidence based review 2022.pdf | 547.55 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
