Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/109878| Title: | Judicial appointments : a comparative approach |
| Authors: | Aquilina, Kevin |
| Keywords: | Judges -- Selection and appointment Judges -- Selection and appointment -- Malta European Court of Human Rights -- Case Law Law -- Malta |
| Issue Date: | 2007 |
| Publisher: | Malta Chamber of Advocates |
| Citation: | Aquilina, K. (2007). Judicial appointments: a comparative approach. Law & Practice, 15, pp. 18, 20, 22, 24, 26. Malta Chamber of Advocates. |
| Abstract: | lntroduction: In a previous article in Law and Practice. Dr. Anton Micallef wrote on the appointment of the judiciary from the point of view of Maltese Law. This paper, on the other hand. studies the method of judicial appointment in other jurisdictions and in international and regional instruments as well as attempts to identify the salient case law of the European Court of Human Rights obtaining on the subject. It concludes by auguring that Malta learns from foreign practice and updates its law on the subject under review accordingly therewith. |
| URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/109878 |
| Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacLawMCT |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judicial appointments a comparative approach 2007.pdf | 1.53 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.