Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141474
Title: From compliance to collaboration : redefining QA in challenging times through digital innovation
Authors: Vanhear, Jacqueline
Azzopardi, Joel
Mhamdi, Chaker
Xuereb, Jonathan
Farrugia, Zuzana
Bezzina, Frank
Keywords: University of Malta
Quality assurance -- Standards -- Malta
Education, Higher -- Malta
Educational innovations -- Malta
Peer review committees -- Malta
Issue Date: 2025
Publisher: ENQA : European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education
Citation: Vanhear, J., Azzopardi, J., Mhamdi, C., Xuereb, J., Farrugia, Z., & Bezzina, F. (2025, November). From compliance to collaboration : redefining QA in challenging times through digital innovation. 2025 European Quality Assurance Forum QA in times of crises : Ensuring stability, autonomy and international cooperation in higher education, Budapest, Hungary.
Abstract: In the face of accelerating political, economic, and technological disruption, quality assurance (QA) in higher education must evolve to remain relevant, resilient, and responsive. This practice-based paper examines the University of Malta’s (UM) digital peer-review platform as a proactive QA initiative that integrates digital technologies to enhance adaptability, foster continuous improvement, and support institutional resilience. Developed using sustainable, open-source technologies, the platform facilitates a flexible, inclusive, and transparent annual programme review process that empowers academics to engage in reflective evaluations, deliver structured feedback, and foster a culture of collaboration, co-learning, and quality enhancement. The platform supports a no-code environment for customisable rubrics and review forms, facilitating adaptability to emergent academic needs without requiring advanced technical expertise. Through collaboration, peer feedback, and real-time oversight, the system fosters a reflective academic culture rooted in shared ownership and continuous improvement. It acts as a QA tool and a catalyst for academic dialogue and innovation—critical qualities during times of disruption. Programme coordinators engage multidisciplinary teams, including students, ensuring holistic evaluation through collaborative submission processes. Peer reviewers, guided by standardised rubrics, evaluate an annual programme review process with clarity and consistency, while automated aggregation of feedback highlights areas of consensus and contention. This structured yet dynamic approach enhances transparency and expedites decision-making, even under pressure. In line with the EQAF 2025 theme, this case study demonstrates how digital QA systems can uphold academic values, promote institutional autonomy, and sustain public trust in higher education. By embedding QA into the everyday academic workflow, UM's model counteracts reductive, compliance-driven approaches and instead fosters participatory governance. Ultimately, UM’s platform exemplifies how agile QA infrastructure supports both quality and innovation in higher education. It serves as a scalable model for institutions seeking to enhance resilience, maintain educational excellence, and contribute meaningfully to society amid ongoing transformation.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141474
ISSN: 13753797
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacEduECPE



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.