Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141811| Title: | Comparative study of everting sutures versus everting sutures and lateral tarsal strip for correcting primary lower lid involutional entropion |
| Authors: | Ahmed, Azzam Abdul-Kader Ahmed, Muna M. |
| Keywords: | Sutures Entropion Eyelids -- Surgery Postoperative care |
| Issue Date: | 2025-11 |
| Publisher: | University of Malta. Medical School |
| Citation: | Ahmed, A. A., & Ahmed, M. M. (2025). Comparative study of everting sutures versus everting sutures and lateral tarsal strip for correcting primary lower lid involutional entropion. Malta Medical Journal, 37(4), 59-66. |
| Abstract: | OBJECTIVE: Everting sutures are a surgical technique used to bring the edges of a wound or incision together, ensuring proper healing and minimizing scarring. The goal of this study is to investigate whether there exists a significant disparity in the surgical results between using everting sutures (ES) alone or combining them with a lateral tarsal strip (ES+LTS) when treating primary involutional entropion. By comparing the outcomes of both methods, we aim to gain a deeper understanding of which one is more effective in addressing this condition. METHODS: In this prospective randomized comparative study. A total of 52 patients were given the chance to have surgery to fix this issue. After obtaining informed consent, these brave individuals were randomly assigned to two groups: one group received ES alone, while the other group received ES+LTS. Each patient was evaluated multiple times post-surgery to ensure everything was healing properly. These evaluations took place one week, three months, six months, twelve months, and fifteen months after the surgery. RESULTS: After undergoing surgery, patients eagerly await a successful outcome. In the case of eyelid surgeries, success is determined by a normal eyelid position at rest, which should be achieved within 15 months of the procedure. Unfortunately, 8 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving us with data from 52 patients. Among these patients, there were 10 failed surgeries for those who underwent ES alone, while those who underwent ES+LTS only experienced 1 failed surgery. Despite the setbacks, the majority of patients experienced successful results and were able to enjoy the benefits of the surgery. CONCLUSION: These data unequivocally shows that patients who underwent ES+LTS procedures had a significantly higher success rate after 15 months compared to those who received ES alone. In other words, the numbers don't lie, and the evidence is indisputable - ES+LTS procedures are the way to go for optimal results. |
| URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141811 |
| Appears in Collections: | MMJ, Volume 37, Issue 4 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMJ37(4)A8.pdf | 806.22 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
