Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148511| Title: | 2026 ESAIC consensus document on mitigation strategies in intensive care medicine : consensus document of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care |
| Authors: | Koch, Susanne Bilotta, Federico Brazzi, Luca Camilleri Podestà, Anne Marie Canle, Mois es De Robertis, Edoardo Gibb, Sebastian Gonzalez-Pizarro, Patricio Henderson, Philip H.Y. Ip, Vivian Jöbges, Susanne Kranke, Peter Kreutziger, Janett McConnell, Paul Metaxa, Victoria Montrucchio, Giorgia Muret, Jane Pecher, Sabine Romero, Caroline S. Weiland, Nicolaas H. Sperna Tomassi, Andrea Trinks, Alexandra Buhre, Wolfgang |
| Keywords: | Environmental health Medical Care -- Environmental Aspects Critical care medicine -- Environmental aspects Climatic changes Greenhouse gas mitigation Greenhouse gases -- Environmental aspects |
| Issue Date: | 2026 |
| Publisher: | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
| Citation: | Koch, S., Bilotta, F., Brazzi, L., Camilleri Podesta, A. M., Canle, M., De Robertis, E.,...Buhre, W. (2026). 2026 ESAIC Consensus Document on Mitigation Strategies in Intensive Care Medicine: Consensus document of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 43(9), 723–736. |
| Abstract: | Due to the continued use of fossil fuels and other chemical pollutants, atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations and environmental pollution continue to rise. The health sector is both a driver and a victim of these developments, and intensive care medicine (ICM), with its high energy demands, extensive use of disposable products, and large variety of pharmaceuticals, contributes substantially to the climate crisis and environmental degradation. The European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) therefore aimed to develop consensus recommendations to reduce the environmental footprint of ICM across Europe. A total of 37 recommendations were initially drafted by four topic groups (1) energy, (2) waste management, (3) medication, and (4) ethics—each composed of three to five experts. To facilitate implementation in both middle- and high-income European countries, the agreement threshold was set at 80%. The recommendations were validated by 37 experts from 20 countries using a two-step Delphi procedure. In the first round, all recommendations reached at least 75% agreement. After amendments to four recommendations based on expert feedback, all achieved over 80% approval in the second round, with 32 receiving more than 90% agreement. The final recommendations address: (1) a complete transition to renewable energy and implementation of energy-saving strategies; (2) optimisation of procurement in clinical processes (10Rs) and waste management solutions for single-use plastics; (3) reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (mainly fluorinated gases) and water toxicity caused by medications, as well as prevention of a further increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR); and (4) implementation of an environment-related, ethically guided precautionary principle. This ESAIC consensus provides a practical framework for sustainable ICM. Stakeholders at all levels should now introduce these recommendations through institutional policies, procurement criteria, guidelines and quality improvement programmes to align intensive care practice with planetary health goals. |
| URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148511 |
| Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacM&SSur |
Files in This Item:
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
