Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/1667
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCuschieri, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorSammut, Mark-
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-23T17:30:02Z-
dc.date.available2015-02-23T17:30:02Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationMalta Medical Journal. 2014, Vol.26(4), p. 17-20en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/1667-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Patients presenting with acute ST- elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) of less than 12 hours from onset of chest pain are candidates for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Aim: To assess the patients’ outcome after 12 months of their admission by a retrospective observational study. Methodology: Data of patients admitted with STEMI and preceding to PPCI between 1st of January 2011 to 30th of June 2011 were analyzed. A total of 105 patients were recruited, identified and analyzed by using Cardiac Investigation and Patient Record (CIPR) software. Survival outcomes were determined by mortality data obtained from the Department of Information, Health and Research. Results: Out of the 105 patients having PPCI, the majority were men (81%). 8.6% died within one year. 20% had scheduled repeat coronary angiography, 9.5% requiring further PCI. 0.95% had target vessel revascularization while another 0.95% was referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) due to triple vessel coronary disease. Unplanned re-admissions rate due to another episode of chest pain was of 5.7%, out of which one presented with another STEMI requiring PPCI. The other patients underwent inpatient coronary angiogram, with 2 proceeding to PCI. The remaining 63% did not experience any other cardiovascular related episodes. Conclusion: This analysis showed that the re- admission rates over a year requiring further interventions were low as was the death rate. Only one target vessel revascularization was performed suggesting that the majority of the PPCI’s performed were successful. This is important when assessing the quality of cardiovascular interventional service provided by our state health system.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherMalta Medical Journalen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectPercutaneous coronary intervention -- Patientsen_GB
dc.subjectMyocardial infarction -- Treatmenten_GB
dc.subjectThrombolytic therapyen_GB
dc.subjectPercutaneous coronary intervention -- Patients -- Malta -- Statisticsen_GB
dc.titleAssessing the outcome of patients who underwent a primary percutaneous coronary interventionen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this article belongs to the Editorial Board of the Malta Medical Journal. The Malta Medical Journal’s rights in respect of this work are as defined by the Copyright Act (Chapter 415) of the Laws of Malta or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this full-text article and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Act provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. This article has been reproduced with the authorization of the editor of the Malta Medical Journal (Ref. No 000002).en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-reviewed-
Appears in Collections:MMJ, Volume 26, Issue 4
MMJ, Volume 26, Issue 4
Scholarly Works - FacM&SAna

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2014.Vol26.Issue4.A4.pdfAssessing the outcome of patients who underwent a primary percutaneous coronary intervention901.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.