Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Assessing the incremental algorithm : a response to Krahmer et al
Authors: van Deemter, Kees
Gatt, Albert
van der Sluis, Ielka
Power, Richard
Keywords: Reference (Linguistics)
Natural language processing (Computer science)
Corpora (Linguistics)
Linguistic analysis (Linguistics)
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
Citation: Deemter, K. V., Gatt, A., Sluis, I. V. D., & Power, R. (2012). Assessing the incremental algorithm: a response to Krahmer et al. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 842-845.
Abstract: This response discusses the experiment reported in Krahmer et al.’s Letter to the Editor of Cognitive Science. We observe that their results do not tell us whether the Incremental Algorithm is better or worse than its competitors, and we speculate about implications for reference in complex domains, and for learning from ‘‘normal’’ (i.e., non-semantically-balanced) corpora.
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - InsLin

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
54.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.