Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Development and validation of RhMAT, as medication assessment tool specifically designed for rheumatoid arthritis management
Authors: Grech, Louise
Ferrito, Victor
Serracino-Inglott, Anthony
Azzopardi, Lilian M.
Keywords: Medical care -- Research
Managed care plans (Medical care)
Outcome assessment (Medical care)
Patient satisfaction
Pharmaceutical industry -- Case studies
Quality of life -- Case studies
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Citation: Grech, L., Ferrito, V., Serracino Inglott, A., & Azzopardi, L. M. (2016). Development and validation of RhMAT, as medication assessment tool specifically designed for rheumatoid arthritis management. Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, 7(1), 89-92.
Abstract: Objectives: The implementation of individualised pharmaceutical care plans based on the identification of pharmaceutical care issues for rheumatoid arthritis patients presenting at outpatient clinic service has been proven to be effective in improving the quality of life of these patients. However, the identification and classification of pharmaceutical care issues into drug therapy problems does not give room to assessment of prescribing trends and adherence to international guidelines. The novel concept of medication assessment tools, is a concept which integrates pharmaceutical care issues within a larger context, that of evaluating the prescribing trends. The objective of this research was to design, and validate medication assessment tools specifically for rheumatoid arthritis patients. Methods: A thorough literature review was carried out to identify the latest evidencebased guidelines on rheumatoid arthritis pharmacotherapy. The rheumatoid arthritis medication assessment tool (RhMAT) was compiled and validated. Key findings: The RhMAT consists of 11 general sections with a total of 54 criteria. For every criteria given, the researcher has an option of four responses ranging from criterion not applicable (N/A), criterion adherence (yes), criterion non-adherence (no) and insufficient data to comment on the criterion. In cases where the criterion is not adhered to this can be justified adherence or unjustified and insufficient data for the researcher to be able to tick appropriately. The expert panel agreed with the final version of the RhMAT. Conclusion: The innovative RhMAT was designed to act as a tool used by pharmacists to be able to detect gaps within patients’ pharmacotherapy against evidence-based guidelines thereby improving the quality of service offered to patients.
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SPha

Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.