Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/50746
Title: Comparison of post-authorisation requirements between regulatory agencies for medicinal products
Authors: Camilleri, Matthew
Borg, John-Joseph
Sammut Bartolo, Nicolette
Serracino-Inglott, Anthony
Keywords: Drug evaluation -- Standards
Administrative agencies -- Medical care
European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products
Drugs -- Law and legislation -- United States
Drugs -- Law and legislation -- Europe
Cardiovascular agents
Issue Date: 2018-09
Publisher: University of Malta. Department of Pharmacy
Citation: Camilleri, M., Borg, J. J., Sammut Bartolo, N., & Serracino-Inglott, A. (2018, September). Comparison of post-authorisation requirements between regulatory agencies for medicinal products. Poster session presented at the 78th FIP World Congress of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Abstract: A poster presentation regarding a comparison of post-authorisation requirements between regulatory agencies for medicinal products. Introduction: Information submitted during the initial registration phase of medicinal products may not be sufficient to fully assess the benefit-risk balance of the product. Post-authorisation studies for new medicinal products are often requested by regulatory agencies to address this limitation and better assess the product. Aims: To compare the post-authorisation study requirements requested by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) using cardiovascular-related medicinal products as examples.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/50746
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SPha



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.