Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/53856
Title: | How effective is our feedback? : feeding forward and self-regulation |
Authors: | Xerri Agius, Stephanie |
Keywords: | Feedback (Psychology) Self-managed learning Learning, Psychology of -- Research |
Issue Date: | 2020 |
Publisher: | University of Malta. Junior College |
Citation: | Xerri Agius, S. (2020). How effective is our feedback? : feeding forward and self-regulation. Symposia Melitensia, 16, 299-308. |
Abstract: | Giving and receiving feedback is based on a number of stages, procedures, and factors that could determine whether the feedback is effective or not. The key stakeholders of feedback are the tutor and the student, who could work together towards building bridges, such as holding dialogues, giving and receiving constructive criticism. Ideally, feedback is not a one-way, top-down approach, where the tutor ‘commands’ the discourse, whilst the student is merely a passive recipient. In whatever form it is delivered, the feedback that is passed on to the student should be more than ‘correcting’ the work; it could involve a communicative approach whereby the tutor passes on salient information that the student may utilise to sharpen his or her work. Hence, the possession of feedback is not solely relegated to the tutor. Instead, there is a transference where the student claims ownership of the feedback, and thus becomes responsible for its implementation. The responsibility to do so should not be perceived by the student as though he or she were doing a favour to their tutor, but an action which is undertaken for their own personal benefit and gain. Rather than feeding ‘back’, it is transformed to feeding ‘forward’, as the tutor provides suggestions that help shape future writing or assigned work. This paper, which is the result of a doctoral study conducted by the author, aims to present some benefits and challenges of feedback. Whilst exploring various areas of feedback, it suggests that, by revisiting practices, perceptions, and conceptualisations, there can be a shift towards feed forward and eventually offer the possibility of harnessing students’ autonomy and self-regulation. |
URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/53856 |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - JCEng SymMel, 2019, Volume 16 SymMel, 2020, Volume 16 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
28 Stepahnie Xerri Agius 299-308.pdf | 234.26 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.