Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/60655
Title: Evaluation of radiotherapy education across the EU and the impact on graduates' competencies working on the linear accelerator
Authors: Couto, Jose Guilherme
McFadden, S.
McClure, P.
Bezzina, Paul
Camilleri, Liberato
Hughes, C.
Keywords: Life skills -- European Union countries
Education -- European Union countries
Linear accelerators -- European Union countries
Radiotherapy -- European Union countries
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: W.B. Saunders Ltd
Citation: Couto, J. G., McFadden, S., McClure, P., Bezzina, P., Camilleri, L., & Hughes, C. (2020). Evaluation of radiotherapy education across the EU and the impact on graduates' competencies working on the linear accelerator. Radiography.
Abstract: Introduction: Regulation and education of the professionals administering radiotherapy treatments in the linear accelerator varies across the EU. However, how different programme characteristics affect the level of competency of these professionals has never been studied before. This study also aimed to assess which are the least and most developed competencies in radiotherapy across the EU. Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed to academic staff teaching radiotherapy across the EU. Staff were asked to identify the characteristics of the course programmes and to classify the level of competency of graduates regarding linear accelerator tasks. Results: Fifty respondents from 19 EU countries answered the questionnaire. The least developed competency theme was pharmacology followed by equipment quality assurance and management and leadership. The most developed competency was positioning and immobilisation, followed by radiotherapy treatment delivery and professional and ethical practice. Some competencies are developed at the same level across EU countries, while others vary considerably between member-states. Longer programmes, with more placements, and larger proportions of radiotherapy in the programme showed significant increase in the development of some competencies. Longer placements in skills labs was correlated with a decrease in competency. Conclusion: There is no harmonisation of radiotherapy eduction across the EU and the differences in programme characteristics are reflected in differences in competency levels of radiotherapy radiographers. This may hinder movement of professionals and create disparities in the level of care offered across the EU. Implications for practice: Longer programmes, with longer clinical practice and adequate proportion of radiotherapy in the course are essential to ensure that these professionals are competent at similar levels across the EU and to ensure patient safety.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/60655
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacSciSOR



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.