Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/97554| Title: | Clinical effectiveness of processed and unprocessed bone |
| Authors: | Galea, George Kearney, J. N. |
| Keywords: | Homografts Communicable diseases -- Transmission Sterilization Bone banks |
| Issue Date: | 2005 |
| Publisher: | Blackwell Publishing Ltd. |
| Citation: | Galea, G., & Kearney, J. N. (2005). Clinical effectiveness of processed and unprocessed bone. Transfusion Medicine, 15, 165-174. |
| Abstract: | Bone allografts have been used clinically for a number of years. Understanding the biology of bone healing and the impact that bone banking has on this helps to improve the methodologies used in increasing the quality and safety of banked bone. Banked hone in its various forms has been used in a variety of surgical procedures, and although there is no doubt that it is clinically effective; most of the studies have been retrospective- and non-randomized. The review attempts to summarize -some of the data in this area and highlights some of the difficulties encountered in such work. Although there is no doubt that bone banking is nowadays better controlled, there are ever-increasing pressures to produce bone that is as safe as possible with the least impact on its effectiveness. This can only be achieved if the requirements of the providers and users of bone are better understood. |
| URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/97554 |
| Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacM&SPat |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical_effectiveness_of_processed_and_unprocessed_bone_2005.pdf Restricted Access | 4.95 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
