Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/120546
Title: Assessment of patterns of patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease — international study (APPROACH-IS) : rationale, design, and methods
Authors: Apers, Silke
Kovacs, Adrienne H.
Luyck, Koen
Alday, Luis
Berghammer, Malin
Budts, Werner
Callus, Edward
Caruana, Maryanne
Chidambarathanu, Shanthi
Cook, Stephen C.
Dellborg, Mikael
Enomoto, Junko
Eriksen, Katrine
Fernandes, Susan M.
Jackson, Jamie L.
Johansson, Bengt
Khairy, Paul
Kutty, Shelby
Menahems, Samuel
Rempel, Gwen
Slumanu, Maayke A.
Soufi, Alexandra
Thomet, Corina
Veldtman, Gruschen
Wang, Jou-Kou
White, Kamila
Moons, Philip
Grech, Victor E.
Vella, Sheena
Mifsud, Anabel
Borg, Neville
Chircop, Daniel
Mercieca Balbi, Matthew
Vella Critien, Rachel
Farrugia, James
Gatt, Yanika
Muscat, Darlene
Authors: APPROACH-IS consortium and the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart International Study (APPROACH-IS)
Keywords: Congenital heart disease -- Research -- International cooperation
Congenital heart disease -- Patients
Heart -- Diseases -- Genetic aspects
Heart -- Abnormalities -- Diagnosis
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Apers, S., Kovacs, A. H., Luyckx, K., Alday, L., Berghammer, M., Budts, W.,...Moons, P. (2015). Assessment of patterns of patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease—international study (APPROACH-IS): rationale, design, and methods. International Journal of Cardiology, 179, 334-342.
Abstract: Background: Data on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in adultswith congenital heart disease (CHD) are inconsistent and vary across the world. Better understanding of PROs and their differences across cultural and geographic barriers can best be accomplished via international studies using uniform research methods. The APPROACH-IS consortium (Assessment of Patterns of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults with Congenital Heart disease — International Study) was created for this purpose and investigates PROs in adults with CHD worldwide. This paper outlines the project rationale, design, and methods. Methods/design: APPROACH-IS is a cross-sectional study. The goal is to recruit 3500–4000 adults with CHD from 15 countries in five major regions of the world (Asia, Australia, Europe, North and South America). Self-report questionnaires are administered to capture information on PRO domains: (i) perceived health status (12‐item Short‐form Health Survey & EuroQOL-5D); (ii) psychological functioning (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale); (iii) health behaviors (Health-Behavior Scale–Congenital Heart Disease); and (iv) quality of life (Linear Analog Scale & Satisfaction With Life Scale). Additionally, potential explanatory variables are assessed: (i) socio-demographic variables; (ii) medical history (chart review); (iii) sense of coherence (Orientation to Life Questionnaire); and (iv) illness perceptions (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire). Descriptive analyses and multilevel models will examine differences in PROs and investigate potential explanatory variables. Discussion: APPROACH-IS represents a global effort to increase research understanding and capacity in the field of CHD, andwill have major implications for patient care. Resultswill generate valuable information for developing interventions to optimize patients' health and well-being.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/120546
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SMed



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.