Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/120546| Title: | Assessment of patterns of patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease — international study (APPROACH-IS) : rationale, design, and methods |
| Authors: | Apers, Silke Kovacs, Adrienne H. Luyck, Koen Alday, Luis Berghammer, Malin Budts, Werner Callus, Edward Caruana, Maryanne Chidambarathanu, Shanthi Cook, Stephen C. Dellborg, Mikael Enomoto, Junko Eriksen, Katrine Fernandes, Susan M. Jackson, Jamie L. Johansson, Bengt Khairy, Paul Kutty, Shelby Menahems, Samuel Rempel, Gwen Slumanu, Maayke A. Soufi, Alexandra Thomet, Corina Veldtman, Gruschen Wang, Jou-Kou White, Kamila Moons, Philip Grech, Victor E. Vella, Sheena Mifsud, Anabel Borg, Neville Chircop, Daniel Mercieca Balbi, Matthew Vella Critien, Rachel Farrugia, James Gatt, Yanika Muscat, Darlene |
| Authors: | APPROACH-IS consortium and the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart International Study (APPROACH-IS) |
| Keywords: | Congenital heart disease -- Research -- International cooperation Congenital heart disease -- Patients Heart -- Diseases -- Genetic aspects Heart -- Abnormalities -- Diagnosis |
| Issue Date: | 2015 |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| Citation: | Apers, S., Kovacs, A. H., Luyckx, K., Alday, L., Berghammer, M., Budts, W.,...Moons, P. (2015). Assessment of patterns of patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease—international study (APPROACH-IS): rationale, design, and methods. International Journal of Cardiology, 179, 334-342. |
| Abstract: | Background: Data on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in adultswith congenital heart disease (CHD) are inconsistent and vary across the world. Better understanding of PROs and their differences across cultural and geographic barriers can best be accomplished via international studies using uniform research methods. The APPROACH-IS consortium (Assessment of Patterns of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults with Congenital Heart disease — International Study) was created for this purpose and investigates PROs in adults with CHD worldwide. This paper outlines the project rationale, design, and methods. Methods/design: APPROACH-IS is a cross-sectional study. The goal is to recruit 3500–4000 adults with CHD from 15 countries in five major regions of the world (Asia, Australia, Europe, North and South America). Self-report questionnaires are administered to capture information on PRO domains: (i) perceived health status (12‐item Short‐form Health Survey & EuroQOL-5D); (ii) psychological functioning (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale); (iii) health behaviors (Health-Behavior Scale–Congenital Heart Disease); and (iv) quality of life (Linear Analog Scale & Satisfaction With Life Scale). Additionally, potential explanatory variables are assessed: (i) socio-demographic variables; (ii) medical history (chart review); (iii) sense of coherence (Orientation to Life Questionnaire); and (iv) illness perceptions (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire). Descriptive analyses and multilevel models will examine differences in PROs and investigate potential explanatory variables. Discussion: APPROACH-IS represents a global effort to increase research understanding and capacity in the field of CHD, andwill have major implications for patient care. Resultswill generate valuable information for developing interventions to optimize patients' health and well-being. |
| URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/120546 |
| Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacM&SMed |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment of patterns of patient reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease International study APPROACH IS rationale design and methods 2015.pdf Restricted Access | 452.38 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
