Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/130358
Title: | COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy amongst COVID-19-positive patients in a Maltese suburban population |
Authors: | Pullicino, Glorianne Ellul, Robert Zammit, Dorothy Garzia, Glenn Abela, Sonia |
Keywords: | Vaccine hesitancy -- Malta COVID-19 vaccines -- Malta Community health services -- Malta Primary health care -- Malta |
Issue Date: | 2024-12 |
Publisher: | Malta College of Family Doctors |
Citation: | Pullicino, G., Ellul, R., Zammit, D., Garzia, G., & Abela, S. (2024). COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy amongst COVID-19-positive patients in a Maltese suburban population. Journal of Malta College of Family Doctors, 13(1), 36-41. |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic brought about
unprecedented demands in primary care service
provision and delivery. Vaccination helped to
alleviate disease burden, control outbreaks,
improve patient outcomes and reduce avoidable
deaths. However, there is limited data on
COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy on selectively
suburban populations in island communities.
It is imperative to identify the rationale behind
vaccine hesitancy amongst patient subgroups. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy amongst COVID-19-positive patients in a Maltese suburban population. The objectives of the analysis include assessing the patients’ attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, providing information to facilitate the planning of vaccination campaigns and to inform the vaccine strategy. METHODS: A quantitative, retrospective, descriptive, crosssectional study was performed. A telephone consultation was conducted on a purposive sample of 700 patients who had a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 between July and September 2021. The novel, validated 5C (Constraints/ Confidence/Collective responsibility/ Complacency/Calculation) scale was used amongst the unvaccinated/partially vaccinated patient population to analyse psychological antecedents of vaccination, facilitate diagnosis, address vaccine hesitancy and potentially, increase vaccine uptake. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v27. RESULTS: Almost one-fifth of participants were unvaccinated or partially vaccinated. The most common psychological underpinnings of vaccine hesitancy were confidence and constraints. Collective responsibility was the least frequent psychological antecedent of vaccination. CONCLUSION: This study provides information for healthcare professionals, researchers, educators and policymakers to guide resource allocation, develop area-targeted public health programmes and mitigate the effects of vaccine hesitancy in suburban populations. |
URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/130358 |
Appears in Collections: | JMCFD, Volume 13, Issue 1 JMCFD, Volume 13, Issue 1 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
JMCFD13(1)A4.pdf | 142.97 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.