Linguistic LOD for interoperable morphological description

Abstract

Interoperability is frequently cited as one important rationale underlying the use of LLOD representations and is generally regarded as highly desirable. However, the concept is generally taken for granted, and rarely analysed or exemplified. In this paper we attempt to remedy these shortcomings by concentrating on morphology, distinguishing three different kinds of interoperability which are relevant to that field. We providing practical implementations making extensive use of the vocabulary offered by Ontololex Morph.