Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/138227
Title: Assessing work–life balance in Malta and Italy : a cross-cultural investigation using exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM)
Authors: Bottaro, Rossella
De Giovanni, Katya
Faraci, Palmira
Keywords: Work-life balance -- Malta
Work-life balance -- Italy
Cultural pluralism -- Malta
Cultural pluralism -- Italy
Structural equation modeling
Quality of work life -- Malta
Quality of work life -- Italy
Work and family -- Malta
Work and family -- Italy
Issue Date: 2025
Publisher: Dove Medical Press Ltd.
Citation: Bottaro, R., De Giovanni, K., & Faraci, P. (2025). Assessing Work–Life Balance in Malta and Italy: A Cross-Cultural Investigation Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling (ESEM). Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 18, 1637-1656.
Abstract: Purpose: Work-life balance (WLB) represents a well-established construct in several fields. However, the post-pandemic period has prompted substantial re-evaluations of the boundaries between professional and personal life among the general population, highlighting a critical need for renewed theoretical frameworks and empirical updates in this field. Our research focuses on the procedure of effectively assessing WLB in different cultural contexts, grounded in well-established theoretical foundations and involving the testing of measurement quality. Thus, the present cross-cultural study aimed to provide new evidence about the dimensionality, validity, reliability, and cultural invariance of the Work-Life Balance Scale and its practical impact on employee well-being. Participants and Methods: A sample of 362 employees (50% Maltese; 50% Italian), with a mean age of 43.36 (SD = 11.51) completed the WLBS in an online survey from March to April 2023. The cultural invariance was tested using the 13-model ESEM taxonomy of full measurement invariance. Moreover, through Network Analysis, the life satisfaction and optimism scales were administered to test the WLBS validity across countries. Results: Results showed ESEM model good fit (X2 =127.609, df = 63, CFI = 0.963, TLI = 0.939, RMSEA = 0.053 [0.040–0.066]) and less correlated latent factors than CFA. Tests of cultural invariance supported a weak invariance (ie, factor loadings and item uniqueness or factor variance/covariance matrix) across countries. Furthermore, the findings supported the validity and reliability of the scale. Conclusion: In conclusion, new evidence about the WLBS theoretical framework and dimensionality was provided by using the ESEM as a challenging psychometric approach. Results from this study also supported its psychometric features and the cross-cultural applicability of the WLBS in two different European countries. The practical recommendations for government policy were discussed.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/138227
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacSoWPsy



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.