Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/138724
Title: Attitudes towards disclosure of familial genetic risk in a Mediterranean island population – a survey of the Maltese population
Authors: Mintoff, Dillon
Booker, Bettina
Debono, Shannon
Farrugia, Matthias
Pace, Nikolai Paul
Keywords: Genetic screening -- Malta
Genomes -- Analysis
Medical genetics -- Methodology
Genetic disorders -- Epidemiology
Genomics
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: Elsevier Masson SAS
Citation: Mintoff, D., Booker, B., Debono, S., Farrugia, M., & Pace, N. P. (2024). Attitudes towards disclosure of familial genetic risk in a Mediterranean island population–A survey of the Maltese population. European Journal of Medical Genetics, 71, 104961.
Abstract: Germline genetic testing has implications that extend beyond the individual patient to relatives, particularly for high-penetrance variants implicated in hereditary cancer or neurodegenerative syndromes. Many countries encourage patient-led communication to inform at-risk relatives, although the efficacy and uptake of this approach varies. Alternative scenarios envisage direct contact mediated by clinicians. The familial disclosure of sensitive genetic information is also determined by complex socio-ethnic factors. To date, no study has explored whether relatives would want to be informed of familial genetic risk and their preferences on different methods of communication in Malta. We thus used a published instrument that utilizes hypothetical scenario methodology to survey the attitudes of the Maltese population (n = 334) to receiving genetic information from family members. Two vignettes on Huntington's disease and colorectal cancer were presented. We also explored preferences towards the communication of genetic risk, confidentiality, and disclosure policies. Our preliminary results show that most respondents want to be informed of their increased risk by a family member or a clinician and would opt to receive confirmatory genetic testing. Most respondents preferred being informed of genetic risk by a close relative, but in the case of non-disclosure would want to be informed by a clinician. Most respondents expressed preference in favour of the introduction of registries, legislative change and sharing of contact details to address cases of nondisclosure. Our findings contribute further to evidence that supports, in selected hypothetical scenarios, an envisioned change in disclosure of genetic data policy by the public that is different from current practice to date.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/138724
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SAna



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.