Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Examining the structural validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in a multilevel framework
Authors: Azzopardi, Lara Marie
Camilleri, Liberato
Sammut, Fiona
Cefai, Carmel
Keywords: Structural equation modeling
Confirmatory factor analysis
Exploratory factor analysis
Students -- Attitudes
Students -- Malta
Issue Date: 2018-09
Publisher: Malta Chamber of Scientists
Citation: Azzopardi, L. M., Camilleri, L., Sammut, F., & Cefai, C. (2018). Examining the structural validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in a multilevel framework. Xjenza, 6(1), 16-24.
Abstract: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), proposed by Goodman (1997), has been used by many researchers to measure the social, emotional and behaviour difficulties in children. The SDQ comprises four difficulty subscales measuring emotional, conduct, hyperactivity and peer problems. It also includes a fifth subscale measuring prosocial behaviour. A sample of 5200 Maltese students who were aged between 6 and 16 years was used to investigate the multilevel factor structure underlying the teachers’ version of the SDQ. Statistical analysis in this study was conducted using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and Multilevel Structural Equation Modelling (MSEM). The study finds that a two-level three-factor model fits the data marginally better than a single-level three-factor model.
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - CenEMER
Scholarly Works - CenRSEH
Scholarly Works - FacSciSOR
Scholarly Works - FacSoWPsy
Xjenza, 2018, Volume 6, Issue 1
Xjenza, 2018, Volume 6, Issue 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Xjenza,_6(1)_-_A3.pdf708 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.