Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||'Temples' or merely buildings for congregation? The prehistoric megalithic structures of Malta (3600-2500 BCE)|
|Keywords:||Megalithic temples -- Malta|
Temple period -- Malta
Architecture, Prehistoric -- Malta
Antiquities, Prehistoric -- Malta
Xagħra Stone Circle (Xagħra, Malta)
Ġgantija Temples (Xagħra, Malta)
Hypogeum (Paola, Malta)
Tarxien Temples (Tarxien, Malta)
Ħaġar Qim Temples (Qrendi, Malta)
Hypogeum (Xagħra, Malta)
Brochtorff Circle (Xagħra, Malta)
|Citation:||Bonanno, A. (2020). 'Temples' or merely Buildings for Congregation? The prehistoric megalithic structures of Malta (3600-2500 BCE). In F. Cousseau, & L. Laporte (Eds.), Pre and Protohistoric Stone Architectures: Comparisons of the Social and Technical Contexts Associated to Their Building. Proceedings of the XVIII UISPP World Congress (4-9 June 2018, Paris, France) Volume 1, Session XXXII (pp. 119-129). Oxford: Archaeopress Publishing Ltd.|
|Abstract:||The paper will unfold under the headings specified in the official announcement of the above
Definition: We are dealing with two types of structures: a) a score of megalithic structures erected above ground according to a substantially standard format but following an evolutionary development marked by increasing complexity in ground plan and in elevation; b) two underground structures (hypogea), one consisting of a natural cave system to which separate megalithic structures were added in a different geomaterial, the other almost entirely carved out of the living rock to form a negative architecture reproducing architectonic elements from the above-ground structures discussed in a). The methodology of construction of a) and the carving of b) will be extensively discussed under this and under the following headings.
Economic sphere: both structural typologies imply a huge investment and expenditure in terms of time, human muscle and endurance, and coordination of effort of a limited population with an agricultural economic orientation. This economy was sufficiently robust to permit this expenditure.
Technical sphere: discussion of questions of procurement of building materials, their manipulation with specific tools (some of which have been identified in the archaeological record) and their erection in accordance to a pre-established architectural design, revealing precocious understanding of the inherent qualities of the building materials and their structural capabilities.
Social sphere: the outstanding dimensions of the building blocks and the size and complexity of the structural design imply the existence of a ranked social structure consisting of the upper echelon of an elite group coordinating the building process and, after completion of the same, the management of the structures and the rituals taking place within and outside them, and, on the lower echelon, the hoi polloi, who supply the labour force during the building process and the surplus of the agricultural economy for the enactment of rituals in both above ground and subterranean spheres.
Symbolic sphere: this prehistoric culture has left us a rich repertoire of abstract art, mainly, an array of differentiated patterns of spirals whose meaning may not be possible to decipher, and an equally rich repertoire of figurative art of both human and animal representations. The animal representations could be associated with animal sacrificial rites. The human ones are somewhat more difficult to pin down, for which one may propose different symbolic meaning for different typologies.
|Appears in Collections:||Scholarly Works - FacArtCA|
Files in This Item:
|10.04 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open Request a copy|
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.