Overview

The examination of the research doctorate is a high-stakes academic responsibility requiring sound judgement, procedural clarity, and a shared understanding of UM’s expectations. This workshop supports academics in developing confidence, consistency, and effectiveness in examining MPhil/PhD students.

The session is structured as a facilitated discussion among three professors with substantial experience in doctoral examination across disciplines. Through dialogue and concrete examples, the panel will explore the full life-cycle of the doctoral examination, including pre-viva preparation, the conduct and structuring of the viva, and post-viva decision-making and reporting. Particular attention will be given to designing vivas that are rigorous, fair, and intellectually robust, while remaining respectful and supportive of candidates.

The workshop will also address challenging situations that may arise during doctoral examinations, such as difficult dynamics with candidates or fellow examiners, disagreements within examining panels, and complex or borderline outcomes. The discussion will emphasise professional judgement, collegiality, and ethical responsibility, promoting transparent and defensible examination practices.

Participants will engage with the panel and peers, reflect on their own examining practice, and gain practical insights to support consistent, high-quality doctoral assessment.

Learning outcomes

By the end of this workshop, the participants will be able to:

• Apply UM procedures and expectations to prepare effectively for all stages of the doctoral examination.
• Plan and conduct a structured MPhil/PhD viva that supports rigorous academic discussion and a fair candidate experience.
• Manage challenging viva situations, including difficult interactions, differing examiner views, and complex outcomes.
• Enhance their examining practice through reflection and peer learning, supporting consistent, transparent, and defensible assessment decisions.